Difference between revisions of "L1 comparison"
From Internet Computer Wiki
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| Nakamoto coefficient || || 22 || || || || || | | Nakamoto coefficient || || 22 || || || || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | Market Cap || || $10,729,261,999 || $4,111,497,102 || | + | | Market Cap || || $10,729,261,999 || $4,111,497,102 || || $155,936,634,353 || || |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Price || || $0.3167 || $13.24 || n || | + | | Price || || $0.3167 || $13.24 || n || $1,274.36 || || y |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Circulating supply || 274,411,339 ICP || || || | + | | Circulating supply || 274,411,339 ICP || || || || || || y |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Volume || 35.85 Blocks/s || || || | + | | Volume || 35.85 Blocks/s || || || || || || y |
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
| repos, DAOs, dapps, tokens || [https://internetcomputer.org/showcase full web3] || [https://cexplorer.io/dapps nft & defi] || || y || n || y || n | | repos, DAOs, dapps, tokens || [https://internetcomputer.org/showcase full web3] || [https://cexplorer.io/dapps nft & defi] || || y || n || y || n | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | Safety threshold || || 51% || || | + | | Safety threshold || || 51% || || || || || |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Burnt fees || 443ICP || || 2,047,382.09AVAX || | + | | Burnt fees || 443ICP || || 2,047,382.09AVAX || || || || |
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 14:17, 9 December 2022
To get a view of the top performers in the blockchain industry, it's useful to compare across common metrics. Here we build a table that does such a comparison. All data correct as of December 2022.
Metrics explanations and references are given below.
Metrics / L1 | ICP | ADA | AVAX | ALGO | ETH | NEAR | SOL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPS | 9’720 | 2.37 | 49.52 | 15.5 | 11.1 | 6 | 3000+ (381 excluding votes) |
Finality | 1-2secs | 5-10mins | 2.3secs | 3.5secs | 15mins | 2.4secs | 5-12.8secs |
Tx Cost | 0.0004 | 0.33 | 0.01 | 0.0003 | 0.57 | 0.0002 | 0.00025 |
Energy Consumption | 0.008 | 51.59 | 4.76 | 2.7 | n | n | 0.166 |
On-Chain Storage | $5 (3.95T cycles x 1XDR) | $17,035 - $113,507 (53,236 – 354708ADA) | $206,875 (15,62 5AVAX) | n | 15,494,409 (12,643.75 ETH) | n | 48,625 (3,477.69 SOL) |
Nodes / Validators | 549 | 1050 | 1195 | 1530 | n | 798 | y |
Nakamoto coefficient | 22 | ||||||
Market Cap | $10,729,261,999 | $4,111,497,102 | $155,936,634,353 | ||||
Price | $0.3167 | $13.24 | n | $1,274.36 | y | ||
Circulating supply | 274,411,339 ICP | y | |||||
Volume | 35.85 Blocks/s | y | |||||
repos, DAOs, dapps, tokens | full web3 | nft & defi | y | n | y | n | |
Safety threshold | 51% | ||||||
Burnt fees | 443ICP | 2,047,382.09AVAX |
Metrics
- TPS measures the transactions processed per second
- Finality measures the time taken for a block to be finalised
- Tx Cost measures the cost of a transaction
- Energy Consumption measures the energy consumption
- On-Chain Storage measures the cost of storing data on-chain
- Nodes/Validators measures the number of nodes
- Nakamoto Coefficient is the count of malicious nodes needed to collude to prevent a blockchain from functioning properly
- Market Cap is the price of the coin times the number of coins
- Price denotes the dollar price of the coin
- Circulating Supply is the count of coins in circulation
- Volume is the amount transferred in a given period
- Users counts the users on the network
- Repos, DAOs, Dapps, Tokens showcases the leading applications supported by the network
- Safety Threshold is the assumption underlying the safety property of a blockchain
- Burnt Fees counts the amount of tokens burnt by fees
References
- ICP : IC Dashboard
- ADA : Cardano explorer and cexplorer
- AVAX : Snowtrace and Avalanche explorer
- ALGO : Algorand website and Algorand metrics site
- ETH : Etherscan
- NEAR : Near explorer
- SOL : Solana website and Solana beach