Difference between revisions of "Internet Computer performance"

From Internet Computer Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
This post describes the DFINITY Foundation's performance evaluation of the Internet Computer. The [https://forum.dfinity.org/t/internet-computer-performance-dec-1-2021-load-testing/9240 current measurements] are from November 2021.
+
This post describes the DFINITY Foundation's performance evaluation of the Internet Computer. The [https://forum.dfinity.org/t/internet-computer-performance-dec-1-2021-load-testing/9240 current measurements] are from May 2022.
  
 
Scalability of the Internet Computer comes from sharding the IC into subnet blockchains. Every subnet blockchain can process update calls (writes) from ingress messages independently from other subnets. The IC can scale up by adding more subnets at the cost of having more network traffic (as applications potentially need to communicate across subnets). In its current form, the IC should be able to scale out to hundreds of subnets.
 
Scalability of the Internet Computer comes from sharding the IC into subnet blockchains. Every subnet blockchain can process update calls (writes) from ingress messages independently from other subnets. The IC can scale up by adding more subnets at the cost of having more network traffic (as applications potentially need to communicate across subnets). In its current form, the IC should be able to scale out to hundreds of subnets.
Line 15: Line 15:
 
=== Update calls ===
 
=== Update calls ===
  
The Internet Computer can currently sustain more than '''11'000 updates/second''' for a period of four minutes, with peaks over '''11'500 updates/second.'''
+
The Internet Computer can currently sustain more than '''22'000 updates/second''' for a period of four minutes, with peaks over '''22'137 updates/second.'''
  
 
The update calls we have been measuring here are triggered from ingress messages sent from outside the IC.
 
The update calls we have been measuring here are triggered from ingress messages sent from outside the IC.
 
[[File:Update calls per second.png|800px|Update Call Performance]]
 
  
 
=== Query calls ===
 
=== Query calls ===
 
Arguably more important are query calls, since they contribute with more than 90% of the traffic we are observing on the IC.
 
Arguably more important are query calls, since they contribute with more than 90% of the traffic we are observing on the IC.
  
[[File:Query calls per second.png|700px|center | Query Call Performance]]
+
The Internet Computer can currently process up to '''1'449'922 queries per second.'''
 
 
The Internet Computer can currently process up to '''250'000 queries per second.'''
 
 
During the experiment each load is increased incrementally and run for a period of 5 minutes.
 
During the experiment each load is increased incrementally and run for a period of 5 minutes.
  

Revision as of 14:21, 12 May 2022

This post describes the DFINITY Foundation's performance evaluation of the Internet Computer. The current measurements are from May 2022.

Scalability of the Internet Computer comes from sharding the IC into subnet blockchains. Every subnet blockchain can process update calls (writes) from ingress messages independently from other subnets. The IC can scale up by adding more subnets at the cost of having more network traffic (as applications potentially need to communicate across subnets). In its current form, the IC should be able to scale out to hundreds of subnets.

Query calls (reads) can be processed locally by nodes in a subnet. The response to a query call can therefore have low latency since the query it just needs a response by a single node and does not need inter-node communication or agreement. The more nodes a subnet has, the more query calls it can handle; and the more nodes the IC has, the more query calls it can handle.

Test setup

The experiments were run concurrently against all subnets other than the NNS and some of the most utilized application subnets to avoid disturbance of active IC users. The IC has a set of boundary nodes that route calls to the core nodes that host the subnets. The experiments sent loads against the subnets directly and are did not route traffic through the boundary nodes. Boundary nodes have additional rate limiting, which is currently set slightly more conservative compared to what the IC can handle and running against the boundary nodes would therefore be unsuitable for performance evaluation. The experiment targeted all nodes in every subnet concurrently, much the same as what boundary nodes would be doing if we would use them.

The experiment consisted of installing one counter canister in every subnet. This counter canister is essentially a no-op canister. It only maintains a counter, which can be queried via query calls and incremented via update calls. The counter value is not using orthogonal persistence, so the overhead for the execution layer of the IC is minimal. Stressing the counter canister can be seen as a way to determine the system overhead or baseline performance.

Measurements

Update calls

The Internet Computer can currently sustain more than 22'000 updates/second for a period of four minutes, with peaks over 22'137 updates/second.

The update calls we have been measuring here are triggered from ingress messages sent from outside the IC.

Query calls

Arguably more important are query calls, since they contribute with more than 90% of the traffic we are observing on the IC.

The Internet Computer can currently process up to 1'449'922 queries per second. During the experiment each load is increased incrementally and run for a period of 5 minutes.

Conclusion and next steps

The Internet Computer today already shows impressive performance. On top of that, it should be possible to further scale out the IC using:

  • More subnets: This will immediate increase the query and update call throughput. While adding subnets might eventually lead to other scalability problems, the IC in its current shape should be able to support hundreds of subnets.
  • Performance improvements: Performance can also be improved by better single machine, network and consensus performance tuning. Increasing the performance by at least an order of magnitude is plausible.

See Also